Page 89 - Edessa, 'The Blessed City'-01, by J. B. Segal (Oxford, 1970). Chapters 1-3
P. 89

76   THE  BLESSING   OF  JESUS  AND  THE  TRIUMPH OF     CHRISTIANITY
                    How long before the   time of Procopius was the  letter  of Jesus inscribed on
                  the  gate  of Edessa?  It  was  not  there  (as we  have  seen)  in  the  time  of  St.
                  Ephraim.  Nor  can it have been  inscribed  before  378.  The  author  of the  so-
                  called  Romance  of Julian was  familiar with  the  topography  of  Edessa,1  and
                  he  has  a  curious  account  of  a  blessing  sent  to  the  city  by  Constantine  the
                  Great, but  removed by the Arian Emperor Valens who died in that year. He
                  does not mention the  letter  on the  gate. The  inscription  was not  on the wall
                  during  the  visit  of Egeria,  probably in  the  middle  of the  fifth  century.  We
                  may therefore assign its appearance in writing on  the  city  gate to the second
                  half  of the  fifth  century.

                    The   'letter  of Jesus'  had  acquired  the  function of a palladium to  protect
                  the  city of Edessa  from  her  enemies.  In  time  a  rival claimant  appeared,  the
                  portrait  of  Jesus.  In  the  Syriac  Doctrine  of  Added,  which  cannot  have  been
                  composed, at least in its present  form,  before about 400, (though its  contents
                  may,  in fact,  be earlier) we are told that two 'chiefs and honoured men' of the
                  court, together with Hannan, Abgar's   secretary,  visited  the  Roman governor
                  in Syria. Thence  they went to Jerusalem. Hannan saw Jesus and wrote down
                  his Acts; on returning to Edessa he related to Abgar all that he had witnessed.
                  Abgar sent  him back to Jerusalem with a letter  to Jesus couched in language
                  closely resembling that of the  letter  in Eusebius.  The  account of this  second
                  journey  of Hannan  to  Jerusalem  has  an  artificial  ring.  He  left  Edessa  on  14
                  Adar (the day of the Jewish festival of Purim, one month before the  Passover),
                  and found  Jesus  at Jerusalem  on Wednesday  12 Nisan (three days before  the
                  Passover)  at  the  house  of  Gamaliel the  High  Priest.2 Jesus  made a reply  to
                  the  letter  of Abgar—orally,  not  in  writing.  Hannan,  however, was also  the
                  royal painter,  and

                  he  took and painted a portrait  of Jesus in  choice paints,  and brought it with him to  his
                  lord  king Abgar. And when king Abgar saw that  portrait he  received it  with great joy
                  and placed it with great honour in one of the rooms of his palace. And Hannan the  secre-
                  tary3 related to him all that he had heard from Jesus, his words being set down in writing.

                  The text goes on to relate the subsequent arrival at Edessa of Addai, his works
                  of  healing,  and  the  evangelization of the  city with the  approval of Abgar.4
                     In  the Doctrine of  Added,  that  is, in the  early fifth century, the portrait  has
                  a  comparatively minor role.  But an  analysis of later  allusions to  the  portrait

                    1  The  Jews  of Edessa,  alleges  the  author of  no  comment.  For the interval  of three days see
                  the  Romance, offered  to  open  to  Julian  the  p.  79  below  on  the  death  of  Addai;  on  the
                  South  gate  of  the  city—the  appropriate  gate,  significance  of  this  period  of  time  see  the
                  as he was on his way to Harran; and Jovian, on  present  writer's  The  Hebrew  Passover,  1963,
                  his  return  from  Persia,  entered  Edessa,  it  144.  The  implicit  reference  to  Purim  may
                  is claimed,  through  the  East  gate.  suggest Jewish  influence in this narrative.
                    2  The  improbability  of Hannan's  arrival  at  3  Syriac,  tabular a, see p.  20  above.
                  Jerusalem  just  before  the  Crucifixion  requires  4  See pp.  78 f.  below.











                                         www.knanayology.org
   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94