Page 83 - Edessa, 'The Blessed City'-01, by J. B. Segal (Oxford, 1970). Chapters 1-3
P. 83

70   THE   BLESSING  OF  JESUS  AND  THE  TRIUMPH OF CHRISTIANITY

                   conversion  of King Abgar to  Christianity;  the  legend  may well  have a  sub-
                   stratum  of fact.  It  no  doubt  arose  while  the  monarchy  was  still  popular  at
                   Edessa.  Scholars have maintained,  with  good  reason,  that the  king in whose
                   reign Christianity made a notable advance in Edessa  was not Abgar Ukkama,
                   but  his namesake Abgar the  Great,  whose long  reign spanned  the  latter half
                   of  the  second, and  the  beginning  of the  third  centuries.  Both  were  sons  of
                   Ma'nu.  Abgar Ukkama's    wife  is  said  to  be  Shalmath  daughter  of  Mihrdad
                   (Meherdates);' the  wife  of Abgar the  Great  may also  have been a  Shalmath,
                   the  daughter  of  Ma'nu  whose  statue  stood  on  the  column  of  the  Citadel
                   mount.2 In  the  legend the  king of 'the Assyrians'  (that  is, of Adiabene) at  the
                   time  of Abgar Ukkama is   called  not  Ezad  (as in Josephus)  but  Narsai.  And
                   in  fact  the  king  of  Adiabene  at  the  time  of  Abgar  the  Great  was  called
                   Narseh;  he  was  drowned  in  the  Great  Zab  by  the  Parthians  for  his  pro-
                   Roman sympathies.3
                     Abgar the  Great  may have been well disposed   towards  the  Christians;  he
                   need  not  have  actually  adopted  the  new  religion.  His  contemporary  Julius
                   Africanus  calls  him  a  'holy  man';  elsewhere  he  is  called  'most  pious  and
                   learned',  but  he  is  not  termed  a  Christian.  The  coins  of  Edessa  carry  the
                   portrait  of this  Abgar—a bearded  head,  wearing with  assurance  and  dignity
                   the  great  tiara  and  diadem  of his  office.4  He  was, we  are told,  friendly  with
                   Bardaisan, the  philosopher-poet  of Edessa, and  he  must  have been a  man of
                   culture.  He  was  a  wise  administrator,  concerned  with  the  welfare  of  his
                   subjects.  It  was he  who  outlawed  the  practice  of  castration  at  Edessa—but
                   this  need  not  have  been,  as  our  source  suggests,  under  the  influence  of
                   Christianity.  For  Abgar  was  also  a  man  of  the  world.  He  had,  no  doubt,
                   like  Bardaisan,  met  ambassadors  from  India,  and  he  visited  Rome  towards
                   the  end of his life.5 We should not  forget  that  even the idealized Abgar of the
                   Addai legend  did not  submit  altogether to the  principles  of Christianity,  for
                   tradition  has it  that  the  great  altar  in  his  palace  remained;  there,  like  some
                   kings of Israel,  he continued  to worship  the  planets  in the  privacy of his own
                   courtyards.  Abgar  the  Great  is  likely  to  have  favoured  Christianity  for
                   reasons of state. He was too shrewd a statesman not to have foreseen the growing
                   threat  to  the  independence  of  Edessa.  Rome  could  no  longer  control  this
                   region from  afar  through  puppet  princes.  The  Parthians  menaced her  com-
                   munications   with  the  East,  and  she  could  keep  the  roads  open  only  by
                   maintaining  garrisons  to the  east  of the  Euphrates  herself.  In  these  circum-
                   stances  Abgar's  friendship  for the  Christians was sound  policy.  It  secured
                     1  See pp.  78 f. This may be a reminiscence of  confusing  Abgar  Ukkama  with  Abgar  the
                   the  Parthian prince who visited Edessa  at that  Great, p.  14 above.
                   time; p.  12 above.                       4  PI.  286  (i).
                     2  See p.  19  above.                   5  There is no  foundation  for  the  hypothesis
                     3  Procopius  relates  that  a  'toparch*  Abgar  of Harnack that Abgar was in direct touch with
                   visited  Rome  in  the  reign  of  Augustus;  he  is  Eleutherius, Bishop of  Rome from  174 to  189.











                                         www.knanayology.org
   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88