Page 57 - Edessa, 'The Blessed City'-01, by J. B. Segal (Oxford, 1970). Chapters 1-3
P. 57

44                    EDESSA    UNDER    THE  KINGS
                  Valentinus,  devised  complex  schemes  of  cosmogony  and  philosophy,  and
                  the  ground was  being prepared  for  the  Manichaean  doctrines  based  upon
                  dualistic conceptions of the  forces  of creation.  The  syncretistic  temper of  the
                  times is well illustrated by the strange sect of the  Elkesaites. The  doctrines of
                  the  Elkesaites were an intermixture  of Judaism,  Christianity,  and  paganism:
                  the  acknowledgement of a  single god,  the  rejection of earlier prophets,  the
                  veneration of water as the  source  of life,  belief in the  male and  female  prin-
                  ciple of Christ and the Holy Spirit, and belief in reincarnation—for  Jesus was
                  reincarnated, the  sect  held, in their  prophet-founder  Elkesai. The  latter was
                  alleged  to  have come from  a  city,  'Serai',  in  Parthia.  Parthia,  it  should  be
                  recalled,  comprises  also the  area of Harran  and  Edessa,  and  the  name  Serai
                  (from  the  Chinese term  for  silk) may allude to  the  silk trade which brought
                  prosperity to the  inhabitants  of those  cities.
                    At Harran, the so-called  'Sabians' (according to texts written at a late date
                  but  describing  the  practices  of  an  earlier  period)  directed  their  prayers  to
                  spiritual  beings which acted  as intermediaries  between men  and  a Supreme
                  Deity; these  beings inhabit  and guide the  planets,  that stand to them  in the
                  relation  of  the  body  to  the  spirit.  The  activity  of  these  spiritual  beings
                  produces  movement   in  space,  and  this  creates  material  things,  plants  and
                  animals  and  men.  But  matter  is  bad  by  nature,  and  human  beings have
                  prejudices  and  passions:  only through  the  influence of the  spiritual  beings
                  are they endowed with   love and  amity, knowledge and feeling. The  Sabians
                  therefore  rejected the  teaching that  a human  prophet  can mediate between
                  man  and  the  Supreme  Deity.  They  did  not  believe  in  resurrection  in  the
                  conventional  sense,  but  every 36,425 years, they  maintained,  a new order of
                  men, animals, and  plants  is created afresh.
                    That Gnosticism,   born  of Oriental theism  and Hellenistic  philosophy, was
                  familiar to Edessans is evident from  a memorial inscription which has already
                  been  cited.1  There  are  undoubtedly  Gnostic  elements,  too,  in  the  Acts of
                  Thomas,  composed probably at this   period,  in part  possibly at  Edessa  itself.
                  In  the  writings  of  Bardaisan also,  scholars  have  discovered  Gnostic  philo-
                  sophy  and  there  is  some  basis  for  their  assertion.  A  hymn  attributed  to
                  Bardaisan  maintains that  first  there  existed five basic  elements:  wind, fire,
                  light, water, and darkness or matter. From these warring elements the  Logos
                  arranged  the  universe; Bardaisan here  follows  the  theories  of Hermogenes.2
                  In  the  Book  of  the Laws of  Countries, members of the  school of Bardaisan are
                  seen  to  wrestle  with the  problems  of good and  evil, free  will  and  fate.  The
                  workings  of  human  nature  and  man's  outer  circumstances,  it  is  affirmed,
                  depend  on  fate,  but  his moral  decisions  are  free,  and  faith  is all important:
                  . . . Those who have not faith  . . . are not competent to speak and to instruct, and they
                  do not easily incline themselves to hear.  For they . . . have no confidence  upon which
                                       1  See p.  34 above.  2  Cf. p.  37 above.











                                         www.knanayology.org
   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62