Page 19 - Edessa, 'The Blessed City'-01, by J. B. Segal (Oxford, 1970). Chapters 1-3
P. 19

6                           THE   BEGINNINGS

                    foothills of the Anatolian massif. On two sides the hills form a natural rampart,
                    and they were easily reinforced  by a double row of walls.  To  the  south-east
                    the  city is exposed to  easy access  from  the  plain  of Harran;  but  this  side  is
                    commanded by a high mount of limestone rock, crowned with a citadel which
                    towers  over  both city  and  countryside.  Water  is supplied  by  a river flowing
                    from  the  north-west  along a deep  wadi to  enter  the  city  in the  south-west;
                    emerging in the east it joins the Gullab, itself a tributary of the  Balikh. It was
                    called  in  Syriac Daisan,  in  Greek  Scirtos—both  names  mean  the  'leaping
                    [river]'. The  title was appropriate.1 It  was a troublesome little  stream whose
                    waters,  swollen by the  onrush  of the  winter  rains  and  the  melting  snows of
                    the  mountains  to  the  north,  brought  sudden  disaster  upon  the  city  and  its
                    inhabitants  at  least  once  in  every century.  Dependence  on  the  river  whose
                    twenty-five  sources  lie at  some  distance  in  the  high  lands  would,  however,
                    have put the city at the mercy of a determined besieger. Fortunately there are
                    copious  springs  of  water  within  the  circuit  of  the  city  walls,  feeding  the
                    famous  fish-pools.
                      Like other  cities established  by the  Seleucids,  Orhay received new names.
                    On  coins of Antiochus Epiphanes (died  163  B.C.)  it  is called 'Antioch  by  the
                    Callirhoe',  or  'Antioch  by  the  beautiful  flowing  [water],2—a  reference,  no
                    doubt,  to  the  fish-pools  as well  as the  river  of  Orhay.  The  same  charming
                    epithet  is  found  also  of  Hierapolis  (Mabbog,  Bambyce), where  also  was  a
                    celebrated  pool of fish, sacred  to  Atargatis,  the  'Syrian  goddess', whose cult
                    is  described  by  Lucian;  and  the  two  cities  were  confused  by  Strabo.3  The
                    conferment  on Orhay of the  name Antioch may have implied that    a military
                    colony there had been raised to the  status  of a city; it then had partial auto-
                    nomy in  issuing  coinage, with the  effigy,  but  not  the  royal superscription, of
                    Antiochus  Epiphanes.  We   may  note  that  Nisibis,  with  which  Edessa  had
                    direct  links,  was  refounded  at  the  same  time  under  the  name  of Antioch
                    Mygdonia.
                      More enduring was another name given to Orhay, probably at a somewhat
                    earlier  date.  The  city  received—under,  according  to  tradition,  Seleucus
                    Nicator—the   name of  Edessa.  Why its  Seleucid  conquerors  bestowed upon
                    it the name of  their own capital  in Macedonia we do not  know. Perhaps  the
                    luxuriance of its waters—the name of the  Macedonian Edessa,   now Vodena,
                    is derived from  voda, water—or its situation  among the  hills recalled to some
                    nostalgic  general the  characteristics  of his  native  town.4  This was the name
                      1  The  name may have been  used  elsewhere  called  Antioch,  named  Callirrhoe  from  its
                    in  the  neighbourhood  of  Edessa  and  with  fountain . .  .').
                    somewhat  different  application;  see  p.  54  3  See p.  46  below.
                    below.                                   *  We  should  not  regard  seriously  the  state-
                     2  So also in Pliny, but  there this may be the  ment  of  a  Syriac  chronicler  that  Edessa  was
                    result  of confusion;  Pliny incorrectly maintains  named  after  the  'oldest  and  first'  daughter  of
                    that  the  city  bore  the  name  Antioch  before it  its founder Seleucus, and was allotted  to her as
                    was  called  Edessa  ('Edessa, that  was formerly  her dowry. Nor should we accept the  suggestion











                                         www.knanayology.org
   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24