Page 109 - Edessa, 'The Blessed City'-01, by J. B. Segal (Oxford, 1970). Chapters 1-3
P. 109

96    THE  BLESSING   OF  JESUS  AND  THE  TRIUMPH   OF  CHRISTIANITY
                  rebukes  Philoxenus.  The  bishop  of Mabbog,  he  states,  'was  at  that  time  in
                  Edessa—of    whom   beyond   all  others  it  was  thought  he  had  taken  upon
                  himself to labour in teaching—yet he did not speak on this subject more than
                  one  day'.  Paul,  who  had  obtained  the  see  of  Edessa  in  501,  also professed
                  support  for  Monophysite   doctrines.  But  in  519  occurred  another  of  the
                  sudden   reversals  of fortune  that  make the  ecclesiastical  history  of this  time
                   so  bewildering.  The  successor  of  Zeno,  Anastasius,  had  been  inclined  to
                   favour  the  Monophysites.  The  following  emperor,  Justin  I,  however,  eager
                   to reconcile the western and eastern  Churches,  insisted on recognition  of the
                   decisions  of  the  Council  of  Chalcedon,  and  there  arose  the  Melkite,  or
                   Imperial group,  to maintain  these  decisions.
                     There  opened  now  a  long  period  of  fierce  persecution  of  Monophysites.
                   The  oppression  is  well  documented,  though  allowance  must  be  made  for
                   the  bias of our  Monophysite  sources. Among the  most implacable leaders of
                   this  campaign,  in  north  Mesopotamia,   were  the  Patriarch  of  Antioch,
                   Euphrasius,  his  successor,  Ephraim of Amid, Count  of the  Orient  (of whom
                   even  his  enemies wrote that  he  was 'just  in his  deeds, not  greedy of bribes,
                   able  and  successful'),  Asclepius,  Bishop of  Edessa, and  Abraham  bar  Kilai,
                   Bishop  of  Amid.  We  are  given  a  list  of  fifty-four  Monophysite  bishops,
                   including  the  great  Severus  of Antioch, who were removed from  their  sees.
                   Not  only monks and   nuns,  but  also  laymen were  driven  from  their  homes.
                   They  were  beaten with  swords  and  sticks,  they  suffered  hunger  and  thirst
                   and  exposure;  soldiers harried  them,  giving them  no time to  eat  or to  rest.
                   Even persons with whom Monophysites found       shelter were punished.  Many
                   priests  perished  miserably  in  exile.  Philoxenus  of  Mabbog  died  at  Gangra,
                   suffocated  by  smoke  from  the  kitchen  of  the  hospice,  over  which  he  was
                   incarcerated.  John  of Telia  travelled  widely in  secret,  ordaining priests  and
                   deacons  and  encouraging   his  fellow  Monophysites  to  hold  fast  to  their
                   beliefs.1  In  February  537, he was apprehended  in  the  mountains of  Persian
                   Mesopotamia    and  extradited;  he  died,  after  torture,  a year later  at  Antioch.
                      In  these  events  Edessa  was  closely  involved.  Its  inhabitants  had  largely
                   declared  for  Monophysitism.  In  519  Bishop Paul was taken by  force  out  of
                   the  Baptistry,  where  he  had  sought  refuge,  and  was  deported  to  Syria.
                   Permitted  to  return  after  forty  days, he  still  refused  to  accept  the  Synod of
                   Chalcedon and was sent into exile at Euchaita in 522. His successor Asclepius
                   became hated for his violent onslaughts on Monophysites,    in which he  used
                   also local army detachments. Edessan monks, notably those of the   Monastery
                   of  the  Orientals,  a few miles south  of the  city, were expelled.  In  April 525,
                   Asclepius seized ten monks and threatened them with torture on the  following
                    day,  unless  they  would accept  Melkite  tenets.  During  that  night,  however,
                   the  river Daisan overflowed  into the  city,  and  there was great  destruction of
                                                  1  See p.  151 below.











                                         www.knanayology.org
   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114